I came just around this thread, while following the DANE progress:

Am 08.04.2014 um 21:48 schrieb Jeremy Harris <[email protected]>:

>> address.  If you really want DNSSEC, you can apply it on the forward
>> lookup, it is unlikely that in-addr.arpa will be signed any time
>> soon.
>> 
> 
> ip6.arpa is - and I'd never have known if exim wasn't able to
> distinguish:
in-addr.arpa has been signed too (in 2011 AFAIK):
- - -
$ dig +dnssec PTR  192.8.111.131.in-addr.arpa.
[. . .]
;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
[. . .]
;; ANSWER SECTION:
192.8.111.131.in-addr.arpa. 85850 IN    PTR     tahini.csx.cam.ac.uk.
192.8.111.131.in-addr.arpa. 85850 IN    RRSIG   PTR 5 6 86400 20140501052605 
20140401195913 41112 111.131.in-addr.arpa. 
KE0p2yIWf8koUd9fGZvuLokCr+c8R/u6QREyuXHOXuUf+UlbmBgCsSbk 
sfhlhlNVciKg7bt3eDcI8Z5IrFrqvqzqN2JSO1wi7o014O+V8DgEtSI+ 
lvsOlItylBNx73vF+eWnqbuHXBsIa3hvFfS8vqZfGA==
- - -

Axel
---
PGP-Key:29E99DD6  ☀ +49 151 2300 9283  ☀ computing @ chaos claudius


-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim 
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##

Reply via email to