https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1805
--- Comment #3 from Todd Rinaldo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Schlittermann from comment #2) > Probably we'll run into some portability issues, since auto allocation of > memory (as done in getcwd()) seems to be a glibc extension. I agree. I am in no way tied to the solution I submitted. I suspected it was possible I could/should use big_buffer given the short distance in code I needed to hold the info but it was Friday, my approach seemed simpler given I hadn't thought about portability, and I wasn't confident I could safely climb through the intervening code to determine if it was feasable. Todd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
