On 17/03/18 01:52, Phil Pennock wrote: > Building for `next-exim` on the exim.org box, the port-26 listener: > > * `EXPERIMENTAL_ARC` is not given with `=yes` in `src/EDITME`, which is > inconsistent at least
Fixed. > * First build attempt failed: > malware.c:2150:6: error: ‘ava_re_clean’ undeclared (first use in this > function) > if (!ava_re_clean) Fixed > malware.c:2156:6: error: ‘fprot6d_re_error’ undeclared (first use in this > function) > if (!fprot6d_re_error) Fixed, though my poor eyes cannot actually see the difference that gitk assures me is there! > * While the `DISABLE_DNSSEC=yes` option has the comment `Enabling > SUPPORT_DANE unconditionally overrides this setting.`, other options > are "you must have this other thing turned on or build will fail", > which might be worth reconsidering. True. Changed to match the general pattern. > Enabling DMARC without enabling > SPF led to a build failure almost at the very end. Compile-time or link-time failure? Do you think we need a specific check early in the build? -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
