https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2410
Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |johan...@sipsolutions.net
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> ---
(In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #1)
> Thanks for the report. If in the definition of DEBUG_BIT you add a cast of
> the result of BIT() to (int), does that pass the compiler check?
It seems to me that this was already fixed by your
commit bd83c6f989cac6318ee32af3e34d3f5e69b27100
Author: Jeremy Harris <jgh146...@wizmail.org>
Date: Thu Apr 25 10:26:46 2019 +0100
Use unsigned when creating bitmasks in macros
since 1<<31 is undefined behaviour in C on 32-bit (so not surprising that a
compiler might warn about it, if not, UBsan would flag it). But it's not
1U<<31, so should be fine (fits into 32 bits).
(Also reported against 4.92, which doesn't have your fix afaict)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
