Hello,

the existing cross-reference point is broken, also the description is
unnecessary short, imho.

cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
>From 01054b307da64e3fe13c6a98911fc71de2a1044b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Metzler <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:13:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Docs: fix cross-reference for $spf_received

---
 doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt b/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
index fef3dfce6..393085832 100644
--- a/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
+++ b/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
@@ -41869,10 +41869,14 @@ variables:
 
 .vitem &$spf_received$&
 .vindex &$spf_received$&
-  This contains a complete Received-SPF: header that can be
-  added to the message. Please note that according to the SPF
-  draft, this header must be added at the top of the header
-  list. Please see section 10 on how you can do this.
+  This contains a complete Received-SPF: header (name and
+  content) that can be added to the message. Please note that
+  according to the SPF draft, this header must be added at the
+  top of the header list, i.e. with
+.code
+add_header = :at_start:$spf_received
+.endd
+  See section &<<SECTaddheadacl>>& for further details.
 
   Note: in case of "Best-guess" (see below), the convention is
   to put this string in a header called X-SPF-Guess: instead.
-- 
2.30.2

-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim 
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##

Reply via email to