https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3118
Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Priority|medium |low Component|General execution |Transports Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Target Milestone|Exim 4.98 |Exim 4.99 --- Comment #5 from Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> --- OK. This demands a bit of shuffling in the implementation, but feels feasible. A forced-fail won't be required, just a zero-length result for the expansion. A wider-coverage alternative would be a fallback-transport, but that would be far more invasive. On running using modified code in Exim - I trust you realize that this destroys any assumptions about how Exim operates, and thereby makes support a random affair and possibly a total time-waster. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-dev.lists.exim.org/ ## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account): ## [email protected] ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
