[Sorry for prematurely sending the previous message] On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:53:00 +0100, Matthew Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Can the system filter access ACL variables? > >As Philip has answered in the affirmative, I guess therefore that this >could be moved there, which would be a bit tidier.
I just tried that, and it works fine. That is an acceptable option, IMO. There is a minor unaestheticism though, the system filter is not subject to macro expansion, so one would have to name the ACL variables by their numeric name instead of having the macro. > These days I try and >avoid the system filter, though, as I tend to forget it, and stuff in >there gets out of date and then later on confuses me. I am not too fond of that feature as well, but _this_ job it does pretty well. At least until Philip finds the time to implement the header weeding in the place where it belongs. >(Incidentally I was looking at our system filter a couple of days ago >and found that Debian exim4 does not come with a system filter at all, >which quite surprised me.) Why did it? The Debian exim4 packages are pretty conservative with filtering, so a system filter has not yet shown necessary. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
