On onsdag 15 juni 2005, 23:16, Mark Nipper wrote: > On 15 Jun 2005, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 18:43 +0200, Steffen Heil wrote: > > > I don't want to take this into account, since I do greylisting at > > > RCPT time. > > > > But that presumably means you're doing greylisting unconditionally. > > It makes a lot more sense only to do it for mail which is actually > > considered suspicious for some reason. > > > > Otherwise you just end up delaying a lot of good mail for no > > reason. > > ��������Isn't that really kind of the whole point? �If the mail > is legitimate (ideally), the remote side will resend in a bit and > the tuplet will be recognized as valid at that point for some set > period of time (few weeks to months normally).
Yup, but I personally has had ambitions to do a bit of whitelisting in RCPT TO, based on FOAF social networks for example, or hook it into a CRM system, if is a commercial setting. I think it would help a bit... Cheers, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Programmer/Astrophysicist/Skeptic/Ski-orienteer/Orienteer/Mountaineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
