On 22 Jun 2005 at 12:30, Michael Johnson wrote about
"Re: [exim] rewriting headers (add a":
| On 22 Jun, 2005, at 11:58:52 AM EDT, Fred Viles wrote:
|...
| > You didn't add mysql_catchall?
Or move it?
|...
| > Since the vacation_director router is "unseen", it shouldn't have any
| > effect on which messages reach the mysql_catchall router. I suspect
| > the problem is that the messages you are testing with are accepted by
| > the mysql_user router, so they don't reach the mysql_catchall router.
|
| If I were to move them to the mysql_user router, this should all work
| again?
I would guess so. mysql_user is the only router that appears to
accept local addresses for delivery. So putting the
headers_add/headers_remove options in that router means they'd be
acted on for *all* local recipients.
Is that what you want? I have no idea what the intended purpose of
the mysql_catchall router is.
|...
- Fred
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
