Greg A. Woods wrote: > Exim should must never allow $sender to expand to anything that can be > represented in the configuration language whenever it is set by an > incoming SMTP (or SUBMIT, or LMTP, etc.) transaction to be a null return > path.
Wow, can I call it or what? Didn't I say this is exactly what he was
harping for a day or two ago?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
