On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 08:18:51PM +0200, V. T. Mueller wrote: > V. T. Mueller schrieb: >> Kurt Lieber schrieb: >>> Ideally, I'd like to prevent the mail from ever touching the disk for >>> speed reasons, but if that's not possible through exim, I can >>> accomplish the same thing by putting the spool on a RAM disk. >> Then make netcat listen on the receiving port, directing outpu to >> /dev/null . [...] > Actually, I think what I wrote you - using the :blackhole: router > option - should be somewhat faster than doing the same thing in a > transport.
Note that there is a semantic difference between redirecting to :blackhole: and redirecting to /dev/null. If you have multiple recipients on a message, the former will blackhole the mail, and the latter will blackhole only that recipient, but deliver it properly to everything else. Cheers MBM -- Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/ (Please use this address to reply) -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
