SPF is hopelessly broken and I can't use it because I filter forwarded email, and those who forward to me don't use the weirds sender rewriying stuff.

David Woodhouse wrote:

On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:03 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 16:05 +1200, Craig Whitmore wrote:
Umm. SPF will do MUCH better and will not give false positives
You're new here, aren't you....

Evidently. Otherwise he'd know better, and/or have already been referred
to either something like http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html or
just to RFC2821 and a large cup of coffee.


--
Marc Perkel - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
   My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com

--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to