On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Richard Clayton wrote: > Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > > >There has also been recent research that shows computers will soon be at > >least as good as people at solving the current generation of CAPTCHAs. > > they're already better :) > that's assuming that the "segmentation problem" of dividing the graphic > into constituent characters is not too complex
Which is rather important given that real-world CAPTCHAs have multiple characters, so I think one should be hesitant to overstate the results of that paper. Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
