Hi !!
Yes, but this is also your decision, you could always accept SPF fail
results if you like.
Which doesn't change the fact that it is a broken and stupid thing to do.
The ability and choice to do it does not alter that. I mean I could just
reject everything outright. My choice. Don't think anyone would call it
anything other than stupid and broken. ;)
You also said RBL are broken, well we use several of them with great
results, but never rejecting on just one RBL. SPF could be used the
same way.
Anyway as i said, rejecting spf fail is not stupid, in any case is the
policy of the sender's domain which could be stupid. We publish spf fail
records for some widely forged non-existant email addresses and
rejecting mail based on those fail results is not stupid, is smart.
--
Best regrads ...
----------------------------------------------------------------
David Saez Padros http://www.ols.es
On-Line Services 2000 S.L. e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pintor Vayreda 1 telf +34 902 50 29 75
08184 Palau-Solita i Plegamans movil +34 670 35 27 53
----------------------------------------------------------------
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
