On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:10:03PM -0500, Herb Martin said: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > What is the thinking on "helo_allow_chars = _" -- other > > than "I want > > > to receive their email" is there a reason to accept or reject such? > > > > It's purpose is to allow certain exceptions (like _) to the > > RFC allowed helo characters. > > > > This was you can allow _ but still disallow other prohibited > > characters that are usually the hallmark of spamware. > > Sorry, I meant the question the other way around: > Do most people think that accepting _underscore is > useful approach? Trouble?
Depends. I found a fair number of federal agencies running Microsoft's famous software that have been configure with hostnames with underscores. For personal use? sure, block 'em. Corporate use or paid clients? I wouldn't.... -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
