--On 1 October 2005 14:19:29 +0200 Leonardo Boselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I do not thing thet whitelisting is good, there are a lot of viruses that
come that way.
well, you don't want to avoid virus scanning, but if an email has no (or
only text) attachments, then avoiding spam scanning can still help.
blacklisting is more effective, and han no false positive.
even spamassassin has a whitelisting capability, and i use here.
however the filter must be used by every single user, since there are
many occasions where a source is considered spam by all but a few
users.
Il 1 Oct 2005 alle 11:10 Odhiambo G. Washington immise in rete
* On 30/09/05 19:21 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> One of the things that is creating SA load is processing good email.
> I'm trying to figure out a way to bless stuff that I know is ham so
> I can bypass spam assassin. And it has to somehow just learn it
> automatically.
DSPAM has that idea already and does whitelist senders. Perhaps you
can consider running DSPAM and SpamAssassin together. However, the
only instances I have seen that done are where the admins use SA
results to train DSPAM.
I'd say this: DSPAM has no load at all, if load is your concern, so
think about embracing it.
--
Leonardo Boselli
Nucleo Informatico e Telematico del Dipartimento Ingegneria Civile
Universita` di Firenze , V. S. Marta 3 - I-50139 Firenze
tel +39 0554796431 cell +39 3488605348 fax +39 055495333
http://www.dicea.unifi.it/~leo
--
Ian Eiloart
Servers Team
Sussex University ITS
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
