Quoting Ian Eiloart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >What is the opinion of the masses, am I right to reject mail to return > >paths if they don't come from <> or postmaster? > I don't think you should.
But don't you agree that a return path is only to be used for returning a message if it can't be delivered, hence 'return path'? I strongly feel the mailinglistsetups at apache.org and mysql.com are b0rked by calling out to return paths with a non-null-sender. > If you do want to, you could set a variable, then test for it in the > PREDATA ACL. If you reject at that point, it won't affect a callout. This is however a nice idea. I might work that out if i find time ;) Thanks, Sander. -- | > > Isn't this a stupid question? | > Isn't this a stupid answer? | No, it was another stupid question. This is the stupid answer. | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
