On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 14:19 +0100, Peter Bowyer wrote: > On 30/06/06, John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So the question is what has happened to the X-Spam-Status header? Can > > anyone give me an insight as to whether the default SA headers should > > appear or are they actually removed? > > SA cannot update the message in this scanning model - any changes it > makes will be discarded. > Ah, that's the bit I couldn't work out. So it is literally a sort of "yes it is spam", "no it isn't spam" test.
What I think I need is a '$spam_status' variable if possible which captures the X-Spam-Status header. The X-Spam-Report ($spam_report) will only occur if the message is spam, whereas the X-Spam-Status header gets added to all messages. Thanks, John. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +44 (0)1752 233839 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
