Mike Cardwell wrote: *snip*
Overlooked something here... > > I did consider configuring it in such a way that we have: > > hide mysql_servers = slavedetails : masterdetails > > When it tries to write to the slave it could fail, and then attempt the > write to the master, which then replicates back to the slave. That's not > a very tidy solution though. > Actually it might be, even as-is. IF you use a different table-name in the master (or set of same) than name(s) you export to the slave (same data), AFAIK it will skip the slave 'coz the called tables do not match. > I'd rather choose the db connection explicitly than exim to try them > in order until one works... > Worth a try? I'm not able to test easily right now. Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
