On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> I thought I'd turn on the header_sender test, so I've been running it in
> logging mode for a while. today I noticed these headers would be
> rejected:
>
> From: "TICKET INTERNETT (AGENTID01138828)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Please do not respond":;
>
> I want to be 100% sure before rejecting e-mail from Amadeus :-), and
> according to my reading of RFC 2822, a group address is perfectly valid
> in Reply-To:
>
> reply-to = "Reply-To:" address-list CRLF
> address-list = (address *("," address)) / obs-addr-list
> address = mailbox / group
> group = display-name ":" [mailbox-list / CFWS] ";"
> [CFWS]
>
> this occured with Exim 4.43, but I don't think this behaviour has been
> changed in newer versions. looks like only a small patch is needed to
> do this right, since there is a nice Boolean parse_allow_group already.
The "small patch" wasn't quite as small as it might have been, because
when I looked at this I found a (small :-) can of worms for some places
in the code that allow group syntax when scanning headers. (You have to
set parse_allow_group before scanning a header by calling
parse_extract_address() multiple times, and then unset parse_allow_group
afterwards, as otherwise it might mess up something later. This is so
that it can keep a group "state" within the whole header line - for
example, to forbid groups within groups.)
Anyway, I think I have sorted this out. I have committed the code, so it
should be in tonight's snapshot.
Philip
--
Philip Hazel, University of Cambridge Computing Service.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
