--On 13 October 2006 19:33:15 +0800 W B Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > B) Our greatest use of 'message' handshakes are in the acl_smtp_predata > section, then in the header, size, MIME, ClamAV checking. All well > before we even consider waking up spamd. Are you sure about the ClamAV thing? Predata? > When it comes to the SA scoring area, we either accept unremarked or > appear to do so, then 'blackhole' unremarked. No moral reqirement to > tell a spammer *anything* and we simply deliver the rest. No, but there's a moral requirement to reject rather than blackhole false positives. There's also a potential legal liability issue. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
