>>>>> "Ian" == Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ian> 3. People using sender verification callouts. They seem to think Ian> it's as bad as sending email, >> Because ultimately it is. Ian> So, if I stopped doing callouts, and chose to bounce spam Ian> instead, that wouldn't be a backward step? False dichotomy. You're not being forced to do either. Ian> You'd be no more unhappy for me to fill your mailboxes with Ian> bounced spam than you are about my callouts? If, for example, I were using BATV, how would I be able to tell the difference? Since there's no benefit to you in bouncing spam, whereas there _is_ a claimed benefit in doing callouts, that means that if the practice of doing callouts goes unchallenged and unpunished, I can expect to see _more_ connections in the long term as a result of callouts (and C/R) than as the result of bounced spam. -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
