On Thursday 26 October 2006 01:19, Martijn Grendelman wrote: > If you use SpamAssassin: it has a number of DATE_IN_PAST* and > DATE_IN_FUTURE* tests.
This is what I use... but I learned by flat out rejecting on them (by upping the scores for those tests) that some senders indeed have bad times. An interesting thing we encountered was a sender hitting one of those as well as the INVALID_DATE header rule. Turns out they were leaving the timezone off of their mailing list software-generated date header, and while they were sending with a valid PST timestamp, our servers run in UTC so without knowing the timezone, figured it was 9 hours off. -- SeattleServer.com Mailing Lists - Casey Allen Shobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://seattleserver.com -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/