On 07/02/07, Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's a first go at sorting out the SPF / HELO issue - what this does > is allow the spf condition to be used in the acl_smtp_helo acl, and if > it is used there, magically checks the sender_helo_name instead of > anything else. > > Behaviour in other ACLs is unchanged. > > Patch is against 4.66. > > Depending on feedback, I'll take this forward to the more generalised > implementation I suggested in bug 464, and fix the outstanding bug > with null senders (new bug 467) >
There's now a better patch attached to bug 467 which has the same effect as the one here, but also fixes the no-fallback-to-HELO bug. The patches are not cumulative - use one or the other. Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
