On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Chris Edwards wrote: > Perhaps I'm out of touch, but I'd have thought if you're regularly getting > load av. in the "tens", then it may be time for some new(er) boxes.
I probably agree, but that isn't going to happen this week. > | Any comments welcome, positive or negative. I feel this change was too > | easy, and something might bite. > > If you're defering lots of connections, I'd have thought the delaying of > much normal mail from proper MTAs that *do* retry would be more noticeable > to users than the rare loss of something that doesn't retry. I'd have thought so too, but not enough for people to complain about it so far. And neither do I encourage any expection that email systems are 'immediate'! Connections tend to be deferred only at the busiest times of day, around lunchtime essentially. Thanks for the comments. Jethro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jethro R Binks Computing Officer, IT Services University Of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
