Hi folks,

I apologise for reposting this, but I'm desperate for some insight
here... any feedback would be very much appreciated...

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:13:27AM +0200, Marc Silver wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> I am currently responsible for the administration of four exim servers
> (running 4.66) which we utilize as our inbound MX servers.  Mail for our
> domain is then manually routed via the exim machines back to our main
> offices using the manualroute option over a compressed ssh tunnel.  I'm
> using the randomize option to give me crude load balancing, but it
> doesn't appear to be working very well.  What I'm seeing is that one or
> two of the servers at our main office seem to be getting much more load
> than the other two.
> 
> I am using the following router:
> 
>   forcepath:
>     debug_print = "R: forcepath for [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>     driver = manualroute
>     domains = !+local_domains:partial0-lsearch;CONFDIR/forcepath.list
>     route_data = ${lookup{$domain}partial0-lsearch{CONFDIR/forcepath.list}}
>     transport = remote_smtp
>     host_find_failed = defer
>     same_domain_copy_routing = yes
>     self = send
>     no_more
> 
> And the following transport:
> 
>   remote_smtp:
>     driver = smtp
> 
> Here are the contents of forcepath.list:
>   domain.co.za: 
> 127.0.0.1::10025:127.0.0.1::10026:127.0.0.1::10027:127.0.0.1::10028 randomize 
> byname
> 
> Can anyone help me to get these machines to balance more equally?  What
> am I missing?

-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to