On 17/07/2007 18:56, Tony Finch wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Nigel Metheringham wrote: >> Now it may be a case that you would get away with just using a DL >> component, but you might not, and even if you won a legal case with >> it, there is sufficient ambiguity for it to cost you a substantial >> amount to make your point :-) > > I think this is silly, and Philip's description of the intent of the > licence is correct. The whole point of the dlfunc feature is to allow > people to extend Exim without modifying it.
Seconded. We can all run exim on any platform we like without exim falling liable to the platform's licence terms (thankfully), and we can all bolt on to exim ditto. Cheers, John. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
