----- Original Message ----- From: "Drav Sloan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "exim users" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [exim] dnsbls
>> I thought the point was that hosts _WITH_ rDNS where being rejected, > because they were "generic". That in my book _IS_ wrong. No reverse is > potentially lazy administration (or due to policy of the clients on > that network). It's not a "be all, end all" indicator of spam, people > filtering on that alone should be slapped about with wet kippers. 1. Most people do not filter on that alone. 2. At least something like 80% (if not more) of servers AT LEAST use it for scoring, if not blocking altogether. 3. The world will not change to suit those that won't make the necessary changes. Sorry, but it's end of story really !! All the best Phil _____________________________________________ Website Hosting from only £5.00 per month. www.medwayhosting.com - +44 (0)1634 856965 _____________________________________________ Digital & Traditional Printing, and much more www.medwayprint.com - +44 (0)1634 281199 _____________________________________________ -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
