Dave Lugo wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Renaud Allard wrote:This further confirms my example 1 as some people are caching DNS much more than they should as my 2 servers static IPs have been removed from sorbs for weeks:Er, what? /greps sorbs' soa out of the logfile ... Apr 27 04:31:13 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080427 083034: subzones=20 datasets=14 Apr 27 23:31:02 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080428 033043: subzones=20 datasets=14 Apr 28 04:30:58 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080428 083037: subzones=20 datasets=14 Apr 28 23:31:47 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080429 033043: subzones=20 datasets=14 Apr 29 04:30:44 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080429 083027: subzones=20 datasets=14 Apr 29 23:31:33 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080430 033047: subzones=20 datasets=14 Apr 30 04:31:29 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080430 083025: subzones=20 datasets=14 Your complaint appears to be with SORBS, not ... ... me :)
Well, I haven't it any false positive for quite some time, and asking sorbs website says:
Netblock: 206.251.244.80/28 (206.251.244.80-206.251.244.95) Record Created: Fri May 12 04:38:48 2006 GMT Record Updated: Sun Apr 6 08:12:16 2008 GMTAdditional Information: This netblock was removed/delisted, future listings will supersede this entry.
Since April the 6th, I am not listed anymore and their TTL is 86400.Since you seem to use a copy of their blacklist, are you sure it is copied successfully, even if SOA suggests it?
No cc of list mail needed, thanks ;)
No need to pursue this on list anyway, it has got seriously OT now.
(and I've added a WL entry here for you, just in case)
Thanks, I am using it :)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
