Ted Cooper wrote: > windy_1 wrote: >> We have a home school project web site for kids ages 6 to 14 and get over >> 500 spam a day, most totally inappropriate for kids. We had to add parents to >> filter the mail. In my opinion it is beyond sick. They have all these stupid >> laws about "child safe content" but they don't give a hoot about someone >> sending porn to the kids or using the kids' web site email address as a >> return >> address to send out porn so the kids get a few thousand bounced porn emails >> obviously not sent by the kids (who's server can NOT send mail). >> Sooooooooo do a whois lookup on ICANN's web site and send an email to the >> person listed as admin. It bounces. Then attach the bounce to a complaint to >> ICANN for improper whois info on the offender. That they will do something >> about >> go figure >> gayle > > You could at least limit the problem by using PVRS/BATV, SPF or simply > denying all outside emails? If it's a kids site where they can only > communicate with each other? I'm just stabbing in the dark here since I > have no idea what the situation is :P > > (On a site note, my exim mailing list exim address is now completely > cycled and the other one has begun life as a conditional spamtrap) > > -- > The Exim Manual > http://www.exim.org/docs.html > http://docs.exim.org/current/ >
Yawn...... I think one of my adresses gets no more spam now than it did a dozen years ago... OTOH, even an alleged NDR won't get past acl_smtp_connect if is has no PTR RR. .... I *do* get one heck of a lot more connection *attempts* than 1,000 a day. Or hour. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
