W B Hacker schrieb:
> "Far-end destination addressee"? > > or combinations of > > selected remote <==> selected local/virtual > > ...is also possible, but needs DB or list matching, which may be > asymmetrically mapped (one:one, one:many, many:one, many:many). > > - and/or combined with other conditionals, such as 'Subject:', type of > attachment, time-of-day, .... MUA or OS used to compose the message .... > > No limits, really. I've got a rule somewhere that rejects anything > coming off a Winbox... > > Which do you seek? I have an Exim box which forwards certain addresses to another server, i.e.: - Exim accepts [email protected] - delivers it to server_2 for [email protected] Now, server_2 rejects this mail for some reason (user does not exist, spam etc.). This means Exim will send a non-delivery report to the original sender. A bit too late, isn't it? This causes lots of trouble: - non-delivery reports get to false users (in case of rejected spam/viruses) - we send unnecessary non-delivery reports for non-existing users; it should be cut off as soon as someone connects to Exim I know the proper way to do it would be to have an up-to-date list of existing users on the Exim box for all "remote users", but it's not always possible. -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
