On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:56:55PM +0100, Mike Slater-Jones wrote:
> fixed_cram:
> driver = cram_md5
> public_name = CRAM-MD5
> server_secret = ${if eq{$1}{username}{password}fail}
> server_set_id = $1So you support exactly one username / password pair, and everyone uses the same username and password, right? > This has worked perfectly fine so far, but what we now need are separate > common authenticators for each of the clients we will be handling mail for, > without having to add each user individually to a password file and checking > against it. So are you saying that you /don't/ want to have a password file like this? alice: alice's password bob: bob's password charlie: charlie's password ... because to me that seems like it's by far the easiest method, so I'm really curious to know why you don't want to do that. Or have I misunderstood? -- Dave Evans http://djce.org.uk/ http://djce.org.uk/pgpkey
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
