Hi!

Physicman wrote, on 22.01.2008 15:31:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:05:33 +0100
> Wolfgang Breyha <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Fine! I'll try to get the patch and documentation reworked again on weekend 
>> and send it to Tom Kistner for CVS inclusion. The main reason why I released 
>> the patch mostly "as is" was that I wanted to wait for feedback first.
>> 
> That would be great. Let me know if I can help in some way. :)

Well, it took me a "little longer" then a weekend, but I rewrote my DCC patch
and put it on again here:
http://www.blafasel.at/exim-dccacl/

I had to change and rework the return codes, too. So everybody using my patch
and using
defer    dcc = *
to greylist MUST change that to
defer    !dcc = *
now, to get the same results.

I also added a new "feature" (or hack). If
$acl_m_dcc_add_header
is filled with some headers before dcc is called, these headers are added "in
deep" as well. I for myself use that to pass the ClamAV result to SpamAssassin
to check for the great sanesecurity patterns there.

Maybe there's a better solution for adding headers in the middle of DATA which
are passed to later ACL stages like SpamAssassin, but this one works pretty
nice;-) Working on a RAM disc (exim scan folder) is highly recommended.

Since Tom added my older patch to the CVS maybe one of the devs can add this
one, too?

Regards, Wolfgang Breyha
-- 
Wolfgang Breyha <[email protected]> | http://www.blafasel.at/
Vienna University Computer Center | Austria


-- 
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to