Renaud Allard wrote:
> > I just installed it on 2 of my production servers running OpenBSD amd64. > > It verifies DKIM fine (well, at least it seems so) > 2009-10-14 14:09:03 [8704] H=sendmail.net [209.246.26.21]:63769 > I=[206.251.244.95]:25 Warning: CSA status: unknown > 2009-10-14 14:09:04 [8704] 1My2f9-0002GO-W3 DKIM: d=sendmail.net > s=gatsby c=relaxed/simple a=rsa-sha256 t=1255522141 [verification succeeded] > > > It sends correct DKIM (although, now I get an error with DK because they > are not present anymore) > Authentication System: DomainKeys Identified Mail > Result: DKIM signature confirmed GOOD > Description: Signature verified, message arrived intact > Reporting host: sendmail.net > More information: http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ > Sendmail milter: https://sourceforge.net/projects/dkim-milter/ > > Authentication System: Domain Keys > Result: DK signature confirmed BAD > Description: Signature verification failed, message may > have been tampered with or corrupted > Reporting host: sendmail.net > More information: http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys > Sendmail milter: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/domainkeys-milter/ In the light of this, is there a way to specify that DKIM is mandatory while DK will not be present?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
