On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Axel Thimm <[email protected]> wrote: > > There is nothing wrong in working on this together :)
I'm cool with that too. My rpm originally came from a fedora package, 4.69-7, so it is really very close to yours. My only addition is to put libspf2 tarball in as a source, and then build it as a lookup module and package it in an exim-spf rpm. I never bothered removing all the exim-sa and exim-clamav logic from the spec file. If I remove that stuff, then mine differs very little from yours. > The packages at ATrpms aim to be compatible (as much as sanely > possible) to the exim packages in RHEL/Fedora, e.g. using the same > lock mechanisms, reuse most of the patches, etc. > > Having said that the 4.70 packages at ATrpms haven't seen that much > testing yet and are therefore also in the "testing" section still. Since our packages are so close, it's a good bet that they'll work just fine. I'm testing mine right now, but for some reason, dkim verification always says none. I'll start a new thread and get some eyes staring at it. -- Regards... Todd The best thing about pair programming is that you have the perfect audience for your genius. -- Kent Beck -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
