On Fri, June 4, 2010 22:38, W B Hacker wrote: > Presuming this applies only to (the balance of) the current session and > child > process, why should it be a 'PANIC' situation anyway? Hard-coded PANIC, > IMNSHO, > should be reserved for events/absence of events that impair the ability of > the > MTA to function at all.
Here are words I don't often speak: I agree with Bill. DKIM sig mismatches appearing in paniclog is silly. Mart. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
