Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2010-06-14 at 20:34 -0400, Dave Lugo wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Phil Pennock wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> Before 4.73 is released and the name becomes forevermore locked in
>>> place, does anyone have any better recommendations on the name for the
>>> new bool_lax{} expansion condition?
>>>
>> bool_softfail ?
>
> But it never fails. It's always true/false, where soft-fail to me means
> "defer".
>
> -Phil
>
Then:
bool_fuzzy bool_fuzz
or
bool_naive bool_trust
or
bool_gull bool_gullible
or just
boolish (as in Bullish)
Bill
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
