On 2011-06-14 at 20:58 +0100, Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 00:24 -0400, Phil Pennock wrote: > > You're using sender *callout* verification to systems not under your > > administrative control. > > Really? Not necessarily.
Not necessarily, but highly likely given that the address which was failing was <[email protected]> and I suspect that address does not *send* a lot of email. > Religion, pfft. Let's deal with it scientifically, please. I tried to assert what happens in practice and advise on how to avoid the issue, not pass a value judgement -- I myself don't block sender callouts, but I've encountered those who do, including the operators of the DNSxL described at: http://www.backscatterer.org/ A headache might have led to my writing style being more abrasive than usual, in which case I apologise for the lack of diplomacy. -Phil -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
