Hi, Martin On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:01:30 +0100 in message number <[email protected]>, received here on 06/07/2011 16:28:59, Martin Nicholas <[email protected]> said:
> > I'd say that SPAM filtering causes more lost mail: silently discarded, placed > in the SPAM folder never to be seen again, than trouble with SPF. The > difference being the results of an SPF check failure is returned to you and > is > thus visible, false positives 'magically' disappear - no problem at all there > then ;-) > Which is why my server does NO spam filtering. It's up to the users what to do about spam; for all I know they may be interested in those offers from the kind people in the penis enlargement lobby. That's how my users like it. -- This is Spain. We do things differently here! Bill Hayles [email protected] -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
