Phil Pennock wrote: > I don't use SA and hadn't looked at sa-exim's implementation before now. > > Make sure you set "SAspamcSockPath" to get to use the daemon instead of > parsing all the Perl modules for every spam received. > > Otherwise, there's a little more overhead even then from sa-exim but not > enough to worry about on any modern system (reads a config file, exec's > another binary; on the same order of the work that Exim does routinely > anyway, so I don't expect it to be an issue).
OK. Will stick with sa-exim for now then. Thanks, David Mathog [email protected] Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
