Ted Cooper <[email protected]> writes: > On 12/01/12 03:15, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> 2012-01-08 05:17:20 1RjkC8-0007uf-24 <= <> R=1RjkC8-0007ue-15 U=Debian-exim >> P=local S=1732 >> >> As I understand it, message 1RjkC8-0007ue-15 provoked a bounce, which is >> fine, but there's no other trace of 1RjkC8-0007ue-15 in the mainlog. >> How is this possible? If I send invalid mail via exim4 -i ..., that >> doesn't appear in the mainlog either, but the R field isn't present in >> the generated bounce: >> >> 2012-01-11 18:09:23 1Rl1fi-0006uz-9R <= <> U=Debian-exim P=local S=759 >> >> What mechanism generated the above log line then? > > A new message ID is generated for the bounce message. The contents of > the message will tell you what the source of the bounce is.
Well, the reason for the bounce is a malformed address, that's indeed clear from the message. However, if I simulate the problem by passing a malformed address to exim -i, I get the second log line, without the R=... part, as expected. What I don't understand is the first log line, which quotes the message id 1RjkC8-0007ue-15, but that message id has no other trace in the logs whatsoever. How is this possible? -- Thanks, Feri. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
