Hi Jeremy,
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Jeremy Harris wrote:
Perhaps you should keep an eye on the devs mailinglist? All
contributions welcome.
Thanks for the suggestion, I've signed up for it.
Then, another route for logging suggestions is the bugs database.
Noted. I thought these were mostly too vague and/or controversial to file
as enhancement requests.
Of course that last task is a huge one, and while I could contribute to
it, I would not like to do it alone, or to simply hack away at it in my
spare time and present it as a "fait accompli". So I'd like to see if
there's any agreement that this is a sensible way to proceed, and if so
to put together a working group, a roadmap and a division of labour.
You'd also lose some existing maintainers.
It's definitely not my intention to alienate anyone. Is that because
some maintainers wouldn't know Python/Lua and wouldn't want to learn? Or
because they wouldn't be interested in Exim any more if it moved in this
direction? Or because it would annoy them?
Cheers, Chris.
--
_____ __ _
\ __/ / ,__(_)_ | Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cambs UK |
/ (_/ ,\/ _/ /_ \ | Security/C/C++/Java/Ruby/Perl/SQL Developer |
\__/_/_/_//_/___/ | We are GNU : free your mind & your software |
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/