Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 12:42 +0200, Cyborg wrote:
Where is the big advantage over ...

- a _local_ mysql database auth ?
- a mysql database server _at all_ ?

If your organisation already has a large, embedded, well-documented,
well-managed, well-understood LDAP directory system - why would you want
to abstract a second (or third) system away from it, just to allow Exim
to work?

Graeme



Same again for an SQL critter, CDB, flat-file .. any add-on.

Point being that ordinarily Exim is less fragile and more efficient with nought but its own built-ins.

But the 'enterprise' costs of administration can show an overall advantage if things can be re-used without too much harm.

One doesn't so much implement 'externals' to support Exim, as option Exim to make use of already justified-elsewhere externals.

Where there has been enough need and the resources to code and test, Exim has acquired all the most useful 'hooks' to ease that sort of integration and re-use with not much more than a box-tick.

ELSE not.

There are tools enough and more to do this indirectly if not directly, so it isn't about 'impossible'. Just not a built-in 'box tick'.

Bill
--
韓家標


--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to