> On 5 Oct 2015, at 13:19, Yan Seiner <y...@seiner.com> wrote:
> 
> On 10/5/2015 7:53 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>> Yes, but it may not be the filters that are at fault. It looks like your 
>> router isn’t being inspected. If an earlier router handles the message, then 
>> your filter won’t be run. Pipe a known message into Exim, and use -d+all 
> Hers's a dump of -d+all:
> 
> http://seiner.com/exim_debug.log
> 
> Thanks.

Hmm, well not many clues here, except that the router is completely bypassed:

05:07:13 22126 --------> userforward router <--------
05:07:13 22126 local_part=yan domain=seiner.com
05:07:13 22126 userforward router skipped: verify 2 0 0

It looks to me like there may be two problems in your router:

require_files = $local_part:$home/.forward

Which might be intended to say require_files = $home/.forward or require_files 
= /home/$local_part/.forward

Also, 
"syntax_errors_to = real-$local_part@$domain"

I know that’s directly from the docs, but I think that should NOT point to your 
email address: you’ll get a warning for every warning message that’s sent. 
Recursively, I think. And that will soon add up. The warning should probably go 
to postmaster, or some such address. Perhaps the "real-" was added to the docs 
to stop people shooting themselves in the foot by copying directly!


-- 
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148

-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to