On Sunday 01 November 2015 12:25:38 Jeremy Harris wrote: > On 30/10/15 20:37, Brent Jones wrote: > > Was the experimental_events slated to be called 'stable', I thought I > > recalled something to that effect :) > > I've not been thinking of moving it to mainline yet, but if there's > enough interest in its use I will. Please speak up. > > Also, are there any additional event types needed? > > > There's an outstanding problem with the stability and visibility > of any variables created in ACLs called from events. This would > need resolution before going mainline, and careful documentation > of the visibility rules. > -- > Cheers, > Jeremy
Yes please. I haven't looked at the events system for EXIM but it does sound usefull, and exactly what I need. I use our mail server for distributed processs management in a number of internal and external ways. This includes using Postgresql with EXIM for data management, and PIPE delivery processes for more complex matters. For process completion and tidy-up, as well as error analysis so far, I've had to resort to end-of-day batch processing to look for the 'Completed' log entries and then perform post-process events. If I could hook into this in real time it would make a number of my processes cleaner. I am also implementing my own SPAM filtering system based email patterns and a number of old email addresses which anre known SPAM honeypots. Being able to hook into the 'Conpleted' event would give me more flexibility in my analysis Gary -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
