On Jan 7, 2016, at 11:47 PM, Ted Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 08/01/16 11:37, Robert Blayzor wrote: >> Or am I missing something and that BATV and SRS re-writes co-exist in >> harmony? It certainly does not seem possible? > > They work together as the SRS system will rewrite the bounced address > back to the BATV address and bounce that back to the original. SRS > chains are possible, but may need DB storage of wrapped addresses if > they are too long, or just for convenience. > > A = Origin server > B = Forwarding server > .. (more fwd servers) > C = Final server > > - A signs address with BATV > [email protected] > - B receives email, wraps address with SRS > [email protected] > (or if this is a multi-step SRS1, ..) > - C rejects or bounces to SRS address (technical difference ignored) > - B unwraps SRS to BATV > - bounce sent back to A
Excellent. That’s exactly what I wanted to know and thanks for the clarity. I wasn’t sure if the delimiters would break anything in the SRS spec when the BATV bounce address merged into the new envelope sender address. -- Robert inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP: rblayzor.AT.inoc.net PGP Key: 78BEDCE1 @ pgp.mit.edu -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
