On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 16:05:14 +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
<exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
>On 06/06/2019 15:07, Marc Haber via Exim-users wrote:
>> Am I doing things wrong by adding the short host name to
>> local_domains?
>
>If it works, it's hard to call it wrong.

It's a matter of personal style, I know, and I would like to know of
any situations where this might be a stupid idea.

>> Why does @ only expand to the FQDN and not to FQDN and
>> the short host name?
>
>Someone would be bound to complain, and ask for a way
>of making it only one or the other.
>
>> Why is there not q special expansion item
>> expanding to the short host name?
>
>Nobody's asked for one?
>People regard the FQDN as being more "real" for the host name?
>
>I'm guessing, only.

Obviously ;-)

>If you're wanting this for ease of deployment across many systems,
>use something like ${extract{1}{.}{$primary_hostname}}

That would be legal syntax as in

|local_domains = 
@:localhost:${extract{1}{.}{$primary_hostname}}:other.domain.example

?

Greetings
Marc

:
-- 
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | 
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834

-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to