On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:11:50PM -0500, Matt Corallo via Exim-users wrote: > The way I was (apparently incorrectly?) interpreting a similar expansion > here is that the host was not verified via FcRDNS due to the presence of the > square brackets in the parenthetical. Apparently that is the way Spamassasin > is also interpreting the same received line, marking all mails as "no > verified RDNS".
Sounds strange... Your original mail passed my Spamassasin with this result: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-100 required=4.7 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, MONEY_CONTENT_02=2, MONEY_CONTENT_02=2, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FOREIGN_FROM=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Here "MONEY_CONTENT_02" is my own test, it catched two "bitcoin" words in line "id=bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23496/review/807558...@github.com" from your mail. But RDNS is not mentioned, dispite of header "Received: from hummus.exim.org ([37.221.193.62]:49438)". Have you X-Spam-Status: records in received mails? Do they mention RDNS? -- Eugene Berdnikov -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/