Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote: > On 2022-12-05 at 11:00:21 UTC-0500 (Mon, 5 Dec 2022 16:00:21 +0000) > Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <j...@wizmail.org> > is rumored to have said: > > > On 05/12/2022 15:38, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote: > >> If you use relaxed instead of relaxed/relaxed, the unspecified body > >> canonicalization is "simple" which is never what anyone should use. > > > > It shouldn't be. The docs say: > > > > "the current implementation only supports signing with > > the same canonicalization method for both headers and body". > > Does the code itself concur? I'm not conversant with the Exim code so > I'm a bit at a handicap in checking. > > If a message arrives with "c=relaxed;" in the DKIM-Signature header, a
No, it arrives with "c=relaxed/relaxed;" no matter if dkim_canon is set to "relaxed" or "relaxed/relaxed" on the sender. -- Victor Sudakov VAS4-RIPE http://vas.tomsk.ru/ 2:5005/49@fidonet -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
