On Mon, 4 Aug 2025, Mike Pellatt via Exim-users wrote:
On 03/08/2025 20:39, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2025, John Levine via Exim-users wrote:
It appears that Andreas Metzler via Exim-users <[email protected]> said:
On 2025-07-31 Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
<[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
If it does turn out that DKIM2 verification is based on libraries,
given the recent comments about libspf2, please ensure that that there
is a well support and maintained public domain implementation for these
libraries.
Who should "ensure this" and how? Are they reading this mailing-list?
Some of them are, but demands that other people spend money to solve your
problems rarely are persuasive.
I find that very demoralising.
Remember the warranty of Open Source:
"If it breaks, you get to keep the pieces"
Putting them back together is left as an exercise for the reader
I am reminded of https://xkcd.com/2347/
This is not as bad, but when the gorillas put new hoops into email
it makes it harder for the small developers.
I was trying to ask that they at least put the new hoops on the highway
so that we don't have to maintain a new path in order to jump through
them.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
[email protected]
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## [email protected]
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
